gasilshows.blogg.se

1. #WINDOWS MAGICPREFS EQUIVILENT UPDATE#
2. #WINDOWS MAGICPREFS EQUIVILENT ARCHIVE#
3. #WINDOWS MAGICPREFS EQUIVILENT PRO#
4. #WINDOWS MAGICPREFS EQUIVILENT FREE#
5. #WINDOWS MAGICPREFS EQUIVILENT WINDOWS#

I'm going to have to start hiding all posts from my friends who use FB Apps that publish activity. Strange that there's been abundant coverage of FB minor events, but none of this much bigger change.

#WINDOWS MAGICPREFS EQUIVILENT UPDATE#

Update 11/21/10: Per comments this has been going on for weeks. I wonder if some app vendors are trying to bypass FB's "Hide All" feature. Update: Some game related posts from today still have the "Hide All. Now I'm seeing Facebook App posts in my news stream - for the first time in a year. I can't hide all posts from, say, "farmville". I can either hide a single post (pointless), or I can hide all from "Joe" (not what I want).

#WINDOWS MAGICPREFS EQUIVILENT ARCHIVE#

We're moving to software rental fairly quickly.įacebook now allows us to download all of our personal information in one zip archive (Account:Account Settings: Download Your Information). Unfortunately iOS App updates are almost automatic, so there's a lot of room for these unwanted contract changes. The new version is really just a demo app. I wouldn't mind the transition if iOS app updates were less automatic. If you’ve already downloaded Shazam, then you can rest easy as the new pricing structure won’t affect you.

#WINDOWS MAGICPREFS EQUIVILENT PRO#

Users who want to get more use out of Shazam can opt to pay for a $5 pro version of the app, which will enable them to tag an unlimited number of songs in addition to providing them with new features such as music recommendations and enhanced search features. But now, the development company behind Shazam is saying that new downloaders of the app will only be able to tag 5 songs a month.

#WINDOWS MAGICPREFS EQUIVILENT FREE#

until recently, Shazam was free and allowed users to identify any number of songs they wanted. Shazam set to limit free iPhone app to 5 songs per month | Edible Apple Ok, so I do open quite old posts with Blogger's editor.Ĭontrary to what's written here, my free version of Shazam was upgraded to a pay version. They've relabeled a "2011" version, but really there have been no changes. Since it was about perfect though, it will be a fine tool for years to come. Lost because I'm pure OS X at home, and because Microsoft has abandoned the product. Within a year or two I bet it's 75% of WLW, and that's way more than good enough. Daniel Jalkut is actively working on MarsEdit though, and I think they'll be there in the next release. I notice more the rich text editor's lack of keyboard shortcuts or menu bar icons for commonly used commands.

The good news is that you can learn to work around the bugs, and there's an end to them. There are bugs with, it helps to include an extra line before the paragraph. Sometimes you just have to switch to the HTML editor to remove tags that seem to confuse MarsEdit - though if you stick with WLW (Windows) and MarsEdit (OS X) you won't run into this problem. I don't see them very often because I've learned workarounds. There are several bugs with the rich text editor portion of WLW. You can alternate editing a post with MarsEdit and WLW by the way. When you paste text, always use "Paste and Match Style" (sure wish that didn't strip out URLs though). Don't touch your posts with Bloggers pustulent editor, open them with MarsEdit. Don't use Google's BlogThis! to create a draft post, use the "Post with MarsEdit"/Blog This bookmarklet that comes with MarsEdit. The key to succeeding with MarsEdit is not to mix MarsEdit posts with any Blogger product. MarsEdit is now about 60% as good as WLW, and that's more than good enough.

#WINDOWS MAGICPREFS EQUIVILENT WINDOWS#

No, it's still not the equal of Microsoft's free Windows Live Writer, but WLW was one of the finest pieces of consumer software created in the past five years on any platform. While I researched alternative hosting solutions, I decided to give MarsEdit another try. Evidently billions of dollars aren't enough to create a rich text editor that knows the difference between and. Six years is a long time to evaluate a product, but not as long as I've been fighting with Google's incompetence. It didn't measure up to my lost love - Windows Live Writer. Finally, in May 2010 I bought it, but by July 2010 I threw it out. In 2007 I gave it a good try, but it fell short. I've been evaluating the MarsEdit OS X blog writing tool since November 2004.